sábado, 22 de marzo de 2014

Polynomial Factoring

Simple Polynomial Factoring 

Factoring polynomial expressions is not quite the same as factoring numbers, but the concept is very similar. When factoring numbers or factoring polynomials, you are finding numbers or polynomials that divide out evenly from the original numbers or polynomials. But in the case of polynomials, you are dividing numbers and variables out of expressions, not just dividing numbers out of numbers.
Previously, you have simplified expressions by distributing through parentheses, such as:
    2(x + 3) = 2(x) + 2(3) = 2x + 6
Simple factoring in the context of polynomial expressions is backwards from distributing. That is, instead of multiplying something through a parentheses, you will be seeing what you can take back out and put in front of a parentheses, such as:
    2x + 6 = 2(x) + 2(3) = 2(x + 3)
The trick is to see what can be factored out of every term in the expression. Warning: Don't make the mistake of thinking that "factoring" means "dividing something off and making it magically disappear". Remember that "factoring" means "dividing out and putting in front of the parentheses". Nothing "disappears" when you factor; things merely get rearranged.



  • Factor 3x – 12.
    The only thing common between the two terms (that is, the only thing that can be divided out of each term and then moved up front) is a "3". So I'll factor this number out to the front:
      3x – 12 = 3(          )
    When I divided the "3" out of the "3x", I was left with only the "x" remaining. I'll put that "x" as my first term inside the parentheses:
      3x – 12 = 3(x         )
    When I divided the "3" out of the "–12", I left a "–4" behind, so I'll put that in the parentheses, too:
      3x – 12 = 3(x – 4)
    This is my final answer:  3(x – 4)
Warning: Be careful not to drop "minus" signs when you factor.
Some books teach this topic by using the concept of the Greatest Common Factor, or GCF. In that case, you would methodically find the GCF of all the terms in the expression, put this in front of the parentheses, and then divide each term by the GCF and put the resulting expression inside the parentheses. The result will be the same. But this seems like an awful lot of work to me, so I just go straight to the factoring.

Here are some more examples: Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved
  • Factor 7x – 7.
    A "7" can come out of each term, so I'll factor this out front:
      7x – 7 = 7(         )
    Dividing the 7 out of "7x" leaves just an "x":
      7x – 7 = 7(x       )
    What am I left with when I divide the 7 out of the second term? Well, if "nothing" is left, then "1" is left. (Remember: 7 ÷ 7 = 1.) So I get:
      7x – 7 = 7(x – 1)
Take careful note: When "nothing" is left after factoring, a "1" is left behind in the parentheses.
  • Factor 12y2 – 5y.
    In this case, no number is a common factor between the two terms (specifically, the 12 and the 5 share no common numerical factor), but I can still divide out a common variable factor of "y" from each of the two terms.
      12y2 – 5y = y(          )
    In the first term, I have the "12" and the other "y" factor left over:
      12y2 – 5y = y(12y     )
    (This is because 12y2 means 12×y×y, so taking the 12 and one of the y's out front leaves the second y behind.) In the second term, I have the "5" left over:
      12y2 – 5y = y(12y – 5)
Don't forget the "minus" sign in the middle!
  • Factor x2y3 + xy
    I can factor an "x" and a "y" out of each term: x2y3 = xy(x1y2) = xy(xy2) and xy = xy(1).
         x2y3 + xy = xy(           )
           = xy(xy2        )
           = xy(xy2 + 1)
Remember: When "nothing" is left after factoring, a "1" is left behind in the parentheses.
  • Factor 3x3 + 6x2 – 15x.
    I can factor a "3" and an "x" out of each term: 3x3 = 3x(x2), 6x2 = 3x(2x), and –15x = 3x(–5). Being careful of my signs, I get:
      3x3 + 6x2 – 15x = 3x(                    )
        = 3x(x2               )
        = 3x(x2 + 2x      )
        = 3x(x2 + 2x – 5)

  • Factor 2(xy) – b(xy). Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved
    This may look different from what I've done above, but really it's not. The two terms, 2(xy) and b(xy), do indeed have a common factor; namely, the parenthetical factor xy. This may be different from what you're used to seeing referred to as being a "factor", but the factorization process works just the same as before.
    First, I'll take the common factor out front:
      2(xy) – b(xy) = (xy)(           )
    From the first term, I have a "2" left over:
      2(xy) – b(xy) = (xy)(2         )
    From the second term, I have a "b" left over:
      2(xy) – b(xy) = (xy)(2 – b)



  • Factor x(x – 2) + 3(2 – x).
    This is almost the same as the previous case, but not quite, because "x – 2" is not quite the same as "2 – x". If I'd had "x + 2" and "2 + x", the factors would have been the same, because order doesn't matter for addition. But order does matter for subtraction, so I don't actually have a common factor here.
    But I would have a common factor if I could just flip (or "reverse the order of") that subtraction. What would happen if I did that? Take a look at the following numerical subtraction:
      5 – 3 = 2
      3 – 5 = –2
    When I flipped the subtraction in the second line, I got the same answer except that the sign had changed. This is always true: When you flip a subtraction, you also change the sign out front. In our case, this means:
      x(x – 2) + 3(2 – x) = x(x – 2) 3(x – 2)
    By reversing the subtraction in the second parenthetical, I have created a common factor, so I can now proceed as I had in the previous example:
      x(x – 2) + 3(2 – x) = x(x – 2) – 3(x – 2)
        = (x – 2)(x – 3)
These examples lead us to the next topic: factoring "in pairs"....

There is one special case for factoring that you may or may not need, depending upon how your book is structured and how your instructor intends to teach factoring quadratics. I call it "factoring in pairs".
  • Factor xy – 5y – 2x + 10.
    Is there anything that factors out of all four terms? No. When you have four terms, and nothing factors out of all of them, think of factoring "in pairs". To factor "in pairs", I split the expression into two pairs of terms, and then factor the pairs separately.
      xy – 5y – 2x + 10
    What can I factor out of the first pair? I can take out a "y":
      xy – 5y – 2x + 10
        = y(x – 5) – 2x + 10
    What can I factor out of the second pair? I can take out a "–2":
      xy – 5y – 2x + 10
        = y(x – 5) – 2x + 10
        = y(x – 5) – 2(x – 5)
    (I took out a –2, rather than a 2, because the leading sign on the pair was a "minus". And I got a "–5" in the result because, when I divided the positive 10 by the negative 2, the result was a negative 5. Be careful with your signs!)
    Now that I do have a common factor, I can proceed as usual:
      xy – 5y – 2x + 10
        = y(x – 5) – 2(x – 5)
        = (x – 5)(y – 2)



Factoring "in pairs" is most commonly used to introduce factoring quadratics. So you may see exercises that look like this:
  • Factor x2 + 4xx – 4.
    This polynomial has four terms with no factor common to all four, so I'll try to factor "in pairs":
      x2 + 4xx – 4
        = x(x + 4) – 1(x + 4)
        = (x + 4)(x – 1)
In the second line above, I factored a "1" out. Why? If "nothing" factors out, a "1" factors out.
  • Factor x2 – 4x + 6x – 24.
    I'll try to factor "in pairs": Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved
      x2 – 4x + 6x – 24
        = x(x – 4) + 6(x – 4)
        = (x – 4)(x + 6)

If you will be using "factoring in pairs" for factoring quadratics (which is not the method I use), your book will refer to it as something like "factoring by grouping", and it will work like this:
  • Factor x2 – 5x – 6.
    First, I have to find factors of the last term, –6, that add up to the numerical coefficient of the middle term, –5. I'll use the number –6 and +1, because (–6)(+1) = –6, and (–6) + (+1) = –5. Using these numbers, I'll split the middle "–5x" term into the two terms "–6x" and "+1x". This will then allow me to factor in pairs:
      x2 – 5x – 6
        = x2 – 6x + 1x – 6
        = x(x – 6) + 1(x – 6)
        = (x – 6)(x + 1)
  • Factor 6x2 13x + 6.
    This is a bit more complicated, because the leading coefficient (the number on the x2) is not a simple "1". But I can still factor the polynomial.
    First, I need to find factors of (6)(6) = 36 that add up to –13. I'll use the numbers –9 and –4, because (–9)(–4) = 36, and (–9) + (–4) = –13. Then I can split the middle "–13x" term into the two terms "–9x" and "–4x", and then factor in pairs:
      6x2 13x + 6
        = 6x2 9x – 4x + 6
        = 3x(2x – 3) – 2(2x – 3)
        = (2x – 3)(3x – 2)
For a complete explanation of these last two examples (whose method may look somewhat "magical" at the moment), please study my lesson on factoring quadratics. The "simple" and then the "hard" case pages should completely clarify the topic.

miércoles, 5 de marzo de 2014

Laws of Exponents


Exponents are also called Powers or Indices
8 to the Power 2 The exponent of a number says how many times to use the number in a multiplication.
In this example: 82 = 8 × 8 = 64
  • In words: 82 could be called "8 to the second power", "8 to the power 2" or simply "8 squared"

Try it yourself:

So an Exponent just saves you writing out lots of multiplies!

Example: a7

a7 = a × a × a × a × a × a × a = aaaaaaa
Notice how I just wrote the letters together to mean multiply? We will do that a lot here.

Example: x6 = xxxxxx


The Key to the Laws

Writing all the letters down is the key to understanding the Laws

Example: x2x3 = (xx)(xxx) = xxxxx = x5

Which shows that x2x3 = x5, but more on that later!
So, when in doubt, just remember to write down all the letters (as many as the exponent tells you to) and see if you can make sense of it.

All you need to know ...

The "Laws of Exponents" (also called "Rules of Exponents") come from three ideas:
The exponent says how many times to use the number in a multiplication.
   
A negative exponent means divide, because the opposite of multiplying is dividing
   
A fractional exponent like 1/n means to take the nth root:

If you understand those, then you understand exponents!
And all the laws below are based on those ideas.

Laws of Exponents

Here are the Laws (explanations follow):
Law Example
x1 = x 61 = 6
x0 = 1 70 = 1
x-1 = 1/x 4-1 = 1/4


xmxn = xm+n x2x3 = x2+3 = x5
xm/xn = xm-n x6/x2 = x6-2 = x4
(xm)n = xmn (x2)3 = x2×3 = x6
(xy)n = xnyn (xy)3 = x3y3
(x/y)n = xn/yn (x/y)2 = x2 / y2
x-n = 1/xn x-3 = 1/x3
And the law about Fractional Exponents:

Laws Explained

The first three laws above (x1 = x, x0 = 1 and x-1 = 1/x) are just part of the natural sequence of exponents. Have a look at this:
Example: Powers of 5
  .. etc..  
52 1 × 5 × 5 25
51 1 × 5 5
50 1 1
5-1 1 ÷ 5 0.2
5-2 1 ÷ 5 ÷ 5 0.04
  .. etc..  
Look at that table for a while ... notice that positive, zero or negative exponents are really part of the same pattern, i.e. 5 times larger (or 5 times smaller) depending on whether the exponent gets larger (or smaller).

The law that xmxn = xm+n

With xmxn, how many times will you end up multiplying "x"? Answer: first "m" times, then by another "n" times, for a total of "m+n" times.

Example: x2x3 = (xx)(xxx) = xxxxx = x5

So, x2x3 = x(2+3) = x5

The law that xm/xn = xm-n

Like the previous example, how many times will you end up multiplying "x"? Answer: "m" times, then reduce that by "n" times (because you are dividing), for a total of "m-n" times.

Example: x4/x2 = (xxxx) / (xx) = xx = x2

So, x4/x2 = x(4-2) = x2
(Remember that x/x = 1, so every time you see an x "above the line" and one "below the line" you can cancel them out.)
This law can also show you why x0=1 :

Example: x2/x2 = x2-2 = x0 =1

The law that (xm)n = xmn

First you multiply "m" times. Then you have to do that "n" times, for a total of m×n times.

Example: (x3)4 = (xxx)4 = (xxx)(xxx)(xxx)(xxx) = xxxxxxxxxxxx = x12

So (x3)4 = x3×4 = x12

The law that (xy)n = xnyn

To show how this one works, just think of re-arranging all the "x"s and "y" as in this example:

Example: (xy)3 = (xy)(xy)(xy) = xyxyxy = xxxyyy = (xxx)(yyy) = x3y3

The law that (x/y)n = xn/yn

Similar to the previous example, just re-arrange the "x"s and "y"s

Example: (x/y)3 = (x/y)(x/y)(x/y) = (xxx)/(yyy) = x3/y3

The law that fractional exponents

OK, this one is a little more complicated!
I suggest you read Fractional Exponents first, or this may not make sense.
Anyway, the important idea is that:
x1/n = The n-th Root of x
And so a fractional exponent like 43/2 is really saying to do a cube (3) and a square root (1/2), in any order.
Just remember from fractions that m/n = m × (1/n):

Example: fractional exponents

The order does not matter, so it also works for m/n = (1/n) × m:

Example: fractional exponents



And That Is It!

If you find it hard to remember all these rules, then remember this:
you can work them out when you understand the
three ideas at the top of this page

Oh, One More Thing ... What if x= 0?

Positive Exponent (n>0)   0n = 0
Negative Exponent (n<0)   Undefined! (Because dividing by 0 is undefined)
Exponent = 0   Ummm ... see below!

The Strange Case of 00

There are two different arguments for the correct value of 00.
00 could be 1, or possibly 0, so some people say it is really "indeterminate":
x0 = 1, so ... 00 = 1
0n = 0, so ... 00 = 0
When in doubt ... 00 = "indeterminate"